"Craig A. James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there no real-time garbage collection at all in Postgres?
No.
> And if so, is this because nobody has had time to implement garbage
> collection, or for a more fundamental reason, or because VACUUM is
> seen as sufficient?
If you really want to know, read the mountains of (mostly) junk that
have been written about replacing VACUUM in pgsql-hackers. The short
answer (with apologies to Winston Churchill) is that VACUUM is the worst
solution, except for all the others that have been suggested.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
