On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 12:09:26PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Maybe, but we should also mention that CLUSTER is a likely faster workaround.
Unless, of course, you don't particularly care about the order of the items in your table; you might end up wasting vastly more time rewriting tables due to unnecessary clustering than for full vacuums on a table that doesn't need it.
Mike Stone ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings