Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 25 April 2008 17:32, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Oddly some dtrace profiling gave me this, which is pretty different, but
>>> certainly doesn't have concerns about TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId
>>
>> .... which seems to pretty much destroy your thesis, no?
> How so? Before the patch we bog down for hours, spending 99% of our time in
> TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId, after the patch everything performs well
> (really better than before) and we spend so little time in
> TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId it barely shows up on the radar.
Oh, you failed to state that the dtrace output was post-patch. You need
to show *pre* patch dtrace output if you want us to think it relevant.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
