Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 26 April 2008 13:26, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Oh, you failed to state that the dtrace output was post-patch.  You need
>> to show *pre* patch dtrace output if you want us to think it relevant.

> Please read up-thread. 

Sorry, I'd forgotten your previous post.

I poked around for calls to TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId that
are in current code and weren't in 8.1.  I found these:

src/backend/commands/analyze.c: 965:                                    if 
(TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin(targtuple.t_data)))
src/backend/commands/analyze.c: 984:                                    if 
(TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(HeapTupleHeaderGetXmax(targtuple.t_data)))
src/backend/commands/cluster.c: 803:                            if 
(!TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(
src/backend/commands/cluster.c: 816:                            if 
(!TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(
src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c: 374:       if 
(TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(xid))
src/backend/utils/time/combocid.c: 108:         
Assert(TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin(tup)));
src/backend/utils/time/combocid.c: 123:         
Assert(TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(HeapTupleHeaderGetXmax(tup)));
src/backend/utils/time/combocid.c: 156:                 
TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin(tup)))

The ANALYZE and CLUSTER calls are not likely to be your issue, but the
one in HeapTupleHeaderAdjustCmax could get called a lot, and the one
in TransactionIdIsInProgress definitely will get called a lot.
Neither of those calls existed in 8.2.

So I think that explains why TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId has
become more performance-critical in 8.3 than it was before.  Will
apply the back-patch.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

Reply via email to