Nice to know. But again, if this cache is kept only on the client side it'll be always lost on disconnect. And if clients are "short-lived" it'll not help.
BTW, is there an option to say "do execution plan as simple as possible"? If you're sure about your data and your indexes - don't need to spend so much time. Rgds, -Dimitri On 5/12/09, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Dimitri wrote: >> Now, as you see from your explanation, the Part #2 is the most >> dominant - so why instead to blame this query not to implement a QUERY >> PLANNER CACHE??? - in way if any *similar* query is recognized by >> parser we simply *reuse* the same plan?.. > > At least in JDBC, there's several open source prepared statement cache > implementations out there that people use. I don't know about other > client libraries, but it certainly is possible to do in the client. > > -- > Heikki Linnakangas > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com > -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
