Josh Berkus wrote:
On 11/16/10 12:39 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
I want to next go through and replicate some of the actual database
level tests before giving a full opinion on whether this data proves
it's worth changing the wal_sync_method detection.  So far I'm torn
between whether that's the right approach, or if we should just increase
the default value for wal_buffers to something more reasonable.

We'd love to, but wal_buffers uses sysV shmem.

Speaking of the SYSV SHMEM, is it possible to use huge pages?

--

Mladen Gogala Sr. Oracle DBA
1500 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
(212) 329-5251
http://www.vmsinfo.com The Leader in Integrated Media Intelligence Solutions




--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

Reply via email to