I just got a pointer on presenting EXPLAIN ANALYZE in a more human friendly fashion (thanks, Agent M!): http://explain.depesz.com/s/A9S
>From this it looks like the bottleneck happens when Postgres does an Index Scan using emotions_moment_id_idx on emotions before filtering on moments.inserted so I thought I'd try filtering on emotions.inserted instead but that only made it worse. At the same time, I noticed that "FROM pg_class, moments WHERE moments.tableoid = pg_class.oid" tends to run a bit faster than "FROM pg_class JOIN moments ON moments.tableoid = pg_class.oid". So I tried: SELECT relname, emotion, COUNT(feedback_id) FROM pg_class, moments, emotions WHERE moments.tableoid = pg_class.oid AND emotions.inserted > 'yesterday' AND moments.inserted BETWEEN 'yesterday' AND 'today' AND emotions.moment_id = moments.moment_id GROUP BY relname, emotion ORDER BY relname, emotion; That was a bit faster, but still very slow. Here's the EXPLAIN: http://explain.depesz.com/s/ZdF On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Alessandro Gagliardi <alessan...@path.com>wrote: > I changed the query a bit so the results would not change over the > course of the day to: > > SELECT relname, emotion, COUNT(feedback_id) FROM pg_class, moments > JOIN emotions USING (moment_id) > WHERE moments.inserted BETWEEN 'yesterday' AND 'today' AND > moments.tableoid = pg_class.oid > GROUP BY relname, emotion ORDER BY relname, emotion; >