On 22.10.2013 23:41, sparikh wrote:
>>From Primary:
> 
> relname       relpages
> pg_toast_17673        1812819
> pg_toast_17594        161660
> pg_toast_17972        121902
> pg_toast_17587        77190
> pg_toast_18537        29108
> pg_toast_17578        26638
> pg_toast_17673_index  19984
> pg_toast_17868        14911
> pg_toast_17594_index  2208
> pg_toast_1072246      1922
> pg_toast_17587_index  1510
> pg_toast_17972_index  1399
> pg_statistic  911
> pg_toast_18694        883
> pg_toast_17578_index  375
> pg_attribute  336
> pg_toast_16475        332
> pg_toast_18537_index  321
> pg_proc       233
> pg_depend_depender_index      176
> 
>>From Secondary :
> ============
> relname       relpages
> pg_toast_17673        1812819
> pg_toast_17594        161660
> pg_toast_17972        121902
> pg_toast_17587        77190
> pg_toast_18537        29108
> pg_toast_17578        26638
> pg_toast_17673_index  19984
> pg_toast_17868        14911
> pg_toast_17594_index  2208
> pg_toast_1072246      1922
> pg_toast_17587_index  1510
> pg_toast_17972_index  1399
> pg_statistic  911
> pg_toast_18694        883
> pg_toast_17578_index  375
> pg_attribute  336
> pg_toast_16475        332
> pg_toast_18537_index  321
> pg_proc       233
> pg_depend_depender_index      176
> 
> Yes, result looks same both on primary and standby.

Yes. And it also shows that the really interesting tables (e.g.
pg_class) are not bloated.

Tomas


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

Reply via email to