> > "Tambet Matiisen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I have a view and update rule on it, which updates another > table. Now I would like to call a function, after update of > the table is done. Also the function must be called in the > same transaction as update. I tried to define an additional > update rule on the view, but doing a SELECT in update rule > spoils the affected records count: > > Try 7.3, we changed the rules about returned records count. > http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/ru > les-status.html >
I have 7.3. When rule and action are the same, everything works fine. Doing an insert in update rule and opposite are OK too. Problem is, when I do select in insert/update/delete rule. Then the result of select is returned instead of command status, even if the select is done in non-instead rule and there is unconditional instead rule. See the example in my previous mail. Tambet ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
