> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 7:01 PM > To: Tambet Matiisen > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SQL] calling function from rule > > > "Tambet Matiisen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Try 7.3, we changed the rules about returned records count. > > > I have 7.3. When rule and action are the same, everything > works fine. > > Doing an insert in update rule and opposite are OK too. Problem is, > > when I do select in insert/update/delete rule. Then the result of > > select is returned instead of command status, even if the select > > is done in non-instead rule and there is unconditional instead rule. > > Oh, I think your complaint is really about the fact that psql doesn't > print the command status if it got any tuples (or even just a tuple > descriptor) in the result series. AFAICT the information returned by > the backend is sensible in this situation: the "UPDATE 1" > status message > *is* returned and is available from PQcmdStatus. psql is > just choosing > not to print it. I'm not sure that that's wrong, though. >
Thanks, I only tested it with psql and got worried. Tambet ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
