Kyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this is only an issue when the user relies on postgres to choose
> a constraint name automatically. Seems like a reasonable approach would
> be to have postgres choose a name for the constraint that happens to be
> unique in the schema (like tablename_fkey_$1).
We have discussed changing the default names of FK constraints before.
I have no problem with doing something like the above --- any objection
out there?
(Of course, this is only a long-term fix for your original problem,
as it'll take a good long while for any such naming change to propagate
to Joe's-Corner-Bar's database.)
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
