Tom Lane wrote:
> Kyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think this is only an issue when the user relies on postgres to
> > choose a constraint name automatically. Seems like a reasonable
> > approach would be to have postgres choose a name for the constraint
> > that happens to be unique in the schema (like tablename_fkey_$1).
>
> We have discussed changing the default names of FK constraints
> before. I have no problem with doing something like the above --- any
> objection out there?
I think it's a good idea. It will also make the error messages of the
kind "foreign key $1 violated" a bit clearer by default.
There will, however, be complaints that the constraint names are not
automatically renamed with the table; but we are used to those by now.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
