Tom Lane-2 wrote > FWIW, I get fairly decent performance for cases like this in HEAD > (at least with a GIN index; GIST seems much less able to do well with > short prefixes). What PG version are you testing?
Thank you Tom, I'm testing on PG 9.1 on UbuntuServer 12.10, 64bit I'll update to 9.2 the next days and try again. Kind Regards Rawi -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Index-Usage-and-Running-Times-by-FullTextSearch-with-prefix-matching-tp5759021p5759045.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - sql mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
