rawi wrote > > Tom Lane-2 wrote >> FWIW, I get fairly decent performance for cases like this in HEAD >> (at least with a GIN index; GIST seems much less able to do well with >> short prefixes). What PG version are you testing? > Thank you Tom, > > I'm testing on PG 9.1 on UbuntuServer 12.10, 64bit > > I'll update to 9.2 the next days and try again. > > Kind Regards > Rawi
Just tested with 9.2: pretty much the same -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Index-Usage-and-Running-Times-by-FullTextSearch-with-prefix-matching-tp5759021p5759645.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - sql mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
