Then you will have
[ receiver strangeMessage ]
on: Error
do: [ receiver otherMessage
on: Error
do: [ self defaultFallback ] ]
^^
Ben
On May 14, 2013, at 10:22 PM, stephane ducasse <stephane.duca...@free.fr> wrote:
> agrh!!!!
> I would vote against it because slowly we would get this plague in the system.
>
> Stef
>
> On May 14, 2013, at 5:35 PM, Benjamin <benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Something like
>>
>> self performIfExists: #blah
>>
>> would reduce the noise a lot :)
>> Then in this methods, we do what we want ^^
>>
>> Ben
>>
>> On May 14, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 14 May 2013 16:21, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I'm in favor killing all the respondsTo:
>>>>
>>>> acceptTextMorphs
>>>> "Accept any text morphs except for those that have no edits."
>>>>
>>>> self allMorphs do: [:p |
>>>> ((p respondsTo: #accept) and: [
>>>> (p respondsTo: #hasUnacceptedEdits) and: [
>>>> p hasUnacceptedEdits]]) ifTrue: [p accept]]
>>>
>>> They're a step up from #isKindOf:. It looks like you need is something
>>> that says "does this object respond to a particular set of messages
>>> (i.e., a Protocol)?". (No, Nicolas, I don't mean a message category!
>>> :) )
>>>
>>> But in this particular case the solution looks like making a
>>> #insertADecentNameHere that particular classes of things can implement
>>> as "^ self hasUnacceptedEdits ifTrue: [self accept]"
>>>
>>> frank
>>>
>>
>
