Hi, On May 22, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 22 May 2013 10:38, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote: >> I would use >> >> TextModelCore >> TextModelExtensions >> >> TextModelCore-Tests >> >> No extra dash in the middle. > > nooooo :) > > But for tests, i +1, the names are not very good. > For package: > > Package-Name-Tick-Tack > > tests should be in: > > Package-Name-Tick-Tack-Tests > > This convention used everywhere in pharo. Please do not do that :). If you do that, publishing Package-Name-Tick-Tack will publish the code from Package-Name-Tick-Tack-Tests, too :). Why? Because we have a lovely implicit one-to-many mapping. So, the pattern I know of is to put the Tests as a discriminator before the variable part of your code. So, something like: - BaseName-Core - BaseName-Tests-Core But, the rule I apply more recently for code is to use - only for categories, and camel case for the Monticello packages. Like this we also document what is the unit of publishing, thus when you look into the code browser we also know what is mapped on a Monticello package. Cheers, Doru >> Stef >> >> On May 21, 2013, at 10:24 PM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> 2013/5/21 stephane ducasse <stephane.duca...@free.fr> >>> >>> >>> On May 21, 2013, at 9:00 AM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> 2013/5/20 stephane ducasse <stephane.duca...@free.fr> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> New TxText version 0.8 is ready: >>>> >>>> - editor stuff extracted to separate packages TxText-Editor and >>>> TxTextTests-Editor >>>> >>>> may be you should call the second package TxTextEditor-Tests >>> >>> >>> I just follow convention of other TxText packages: TxText-Model -> >>> TxTextTests-Model, TxText-Layout -> TxTextTests-Layout and etc. >>> Some times ago I suggest such repackaging and nobody was against it >>> >>> >>> Still I think that the packages names are not good. I do not hitnk that >>> having tests mixed with the package name is a good approach >>> and we should clean all of them for 3.0 >> >> >> So what the correct way (Pharo way) to name test packages? >> For example I have 'MyPackage-SubCat1-SubCat2'. What name for test package >> should be? >> >>> >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Value is always contextual."
