Not even for Moose it makes sense to deploy without tests :) Doru
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com>wrote: > >>> > >> technically yes, but you do not need many things to run the code: > >> - class comments > >> - method comments > >> - any documentation in general > >> > > > > And I don't have it at production because I don't have changes file here. > > > > > >> yet you load them. so I wonder if it makes sense to even load tests > >> separately? > >> > > > > It make sense when you try to reduce production image size. And loading > > only required packages (without tests) works well. Why change it? > > I know that this scheme is in use, but why? why do I have to reduce the > size > of a production image? from how many to many megabytes? It might make sense > for moose, but none of the other projects. Do you really care if the image > is > 35 instead of 25MB? To me this argument sounds invalid :/ > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
