can you propose a fix? + bug entry :) Stef On Jun 2, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2 June 2013 14:13, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote: >> Hi igor >> >> after our discussions about the fact that we should not use weak with block, >> I checked and >> >> WeakSubscriptionBuilder>>on: anAnnouncementClass do: aValuable >> ^ self subscribe: anAnnouncementClass do: aValuable >> >> Does not look like raising error. >> > yes.. > so we need to change it to throw error. > > (by making dirty patch in subscribe: anAnnouncementClass do: aValuable , > testing if valuable is block) > > :) > > it is strange.. i remember we wrote code which were throwing error.. > Even class comment says it: > > I am a wrapper around an Announcer, used to create weak subscriptions > at subscription time. > > Use me like this: > > anAnnouncer weak subscribe: Announcement send: #foo to: barObject. > > I raise an error for block subscriptions, as they require non-existing > Ephemeron support to function correctly. > >> Stef > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. >
