What would you put in that cache? Esteban A. Maringolo
2013/9/16 Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com>: > sure, go ahead. > > On 2013-09-16, at 05:13, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> i would like session to support a cache. >> something like >> either: >> Smalltalk session at: x ifAbsentPut: [ y ] >> or >> Smalltalk session cacheAt: x ifAbsentPut: [ y ] >> >> >> >> On 13 September 2013 17:27, Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2013-09-13, at 12:09, Chris Cunningham <cunningham...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> so, if this is a class, would Session be an appropriate superclass for a >>>> WebSession class? or any other type of Session class? >>> >>> I would say so. It is as generic as the name suggests. The class is >>> lightweight >>> and only contains the time when it was created. >>> >>>> That particular >>>> name would seem to collide with other forms of Sessions, wouldn't it? Or >>>> is this safely hidden in a Pharo Environment, so it won't collide >>> elsewhere >>>> (or entice other developers to try to use it for other Session style >>>> objects)? >>> >>> It is a normal class, thus yes, collision is possible. Again, it can easily >>> serve as a superclass for other session-like objects. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Igor Stasenko. >
