The author of the test is Andreas Raab, but I'm not sure who found it (excavating mailing list is hard work)
2013/10/25 Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> > > > > On 25 October 2013 00:26, Nicolas Cellier < > nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hard to debug this kind of code :( >> This is reproducible on Squeak wiht on:do:, so on:fork: bizareness apart, >> this is another flaw in exception handling, along with wrong handler for >> nested exception (testHandlerFromAction below), unless it's an avatar. >> >> Still, I do not see how you get the errorSubscriptBound:... >> In Squeak that would mean that you sent #handleSignal: to a not >> isHandlerContext ContextPart... >> I never saw this, but if Eliot says so... >> >> >> >> ExceptionTests>>testHandlerFromAction >> "A test ensuring that nested exceptions work as expected." >> >> | result | >> result := [ >> [ >> [self error: 'trigger error'] on: ZeroDivide do: [ :ex | >> 'inner' ] >> ] on: Error do: [ :ex | 3 / 0 ] >> ] on: ZeroDivide do: [ :ex | 'outer' ]. >> self assert: 'outer' equals: result description: 'Incorrect handler'. >> >> good find :) > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11996/Wrong-exception-handler-problem > > >> >> >> 2013/10/24 Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> >> >>> >>> ok, it seems i found how to reproduce the situation with following: >>> >>> [ [ 1/0 ] ensure: [ nil foo ] ] on: Error fork: [ :ex | 1halt ] >>> >>> you will get halt, and if you close the debugger , it will throw unwind >>> error. >>> (while instead it should throw DNU) >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Igor Stasenko. >>> >> >> > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. >
