On Oct 30, 2013, at 10:36 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think there's something to fix. > You cannot 'extend' classes belonging to other package in any other way > than adding extension methods. Exact this was my conclusion too. > Allowing extension of ivars or any other vars by foreign package > is road to nowhere. > > I would not like if shape of my kernel classes depends on what packages i load > or in what order i loaded them. > To me it is clear that if one needs to add/remove/modify instance variables > of some class, those changes should belong to the package containing that > class, > not some random package. If that would be that simple :) The case of Gisela is that her tool should extend AST node. Stef
