Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
On 08 Nov 2013, at 18:53, Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com> wrote:

  
yes, you have re-validate for each new image version, since things might have changed in between ;)

Note the tags on the left side: Validated in 30547, Validated in 30555, Validated in 30556, Validated in 30557, Validated in 30558, Validated in 30559
    
I understand, but they should be integrated, right ?
Instead of making noise in my mailbox ;-)
  

That would seem to be a lot of additional work for the monkey, which might not be a problem if the set of Cases is small or CPU resources are high.

Perhaps the process could be amended so the monkey operates in two stages. 
1. In taking the status from "Fix review needed" to "Fix Reviewed by the Monkey" - the monkey runs once and does not run again.
2. When a human comes along and changes the status to "Fix to include", the monkey runs again, and also for each image update until integrated.  The status would not change from "Fix to include".

Optionally Step 2 could also...
2a. In consideration of how several fixes are usually integrated in one image step, the monkey could consecutively load several Fixes on top of the previous image step, to check for incompatibilities between Fixes, and advise the human integrator of a known good order of integration; OR...
2b. A successful monkey test of "Fix to Include" automatically kicks off a CI run on that Fix.   So that you end up with one Fix per image step.  Probably this doubles up on the CI test run, but should ensure the CI never goes red; OR...
2c. A combination of 2a & 2b.  The monkey loads several "Fix to Include" Fixes until there is a problem, and copies all the good ones to kick off a CI run.

So I know that would require some effort, but just food for thought.  I'd be interested in helping do this.

cheers -ben
  
On 2013-11-08, at 18:26, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote:

    
This had been verified 6 times, is that normal ?

On 08 Nov 2013, at 18:25, Pharo Issue Tracker <do-not-re...@pharo.fogbugz.com> wrote:

      
A FogBugz case was edited by Ulysse The Galactic Monkey From Outer Space.

Case ID:      2486
Title:        Linux VM: Umlaute äöÜ etc in in file/directory names: UTF8 unicode problem?
Status:       Resolved (Fix Reviewed by the Monkey)
Category:     Bug
Project:      File System
Area:         1. Pharo Image
Priority:     5 - Fix If Time
Milestone:    Pharo3.0: 30/03/2014
Assigned To:  Penelope, Ulysse's wife

URL:          https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/2486


Changes: 
Added tag 'Validated in 30559'.



You are subscribed to this case.  If you do not want to receive automatic notifications in the future, unsubscribe (https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?pre=preUnsubscribe&pg=pgEditBug&command=view&ixBug=2486) from this case.

_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
pharo-bugtrac...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker
        
      
    


  

Reply via email to