On 09 Nov 2013, at 10:35, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote:
> > On 08 Nov 2013, at 19:39, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote: > >> >> On 08 Nov 2013, at 19:16, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 08 Nov 2013, at 18:53, Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> yes, you have re-validate for each new image version, since things might >>>> have changed in between ;) >>>> >>>> Note the tags on the left side: Validated in 30547, Validated in 30555, >>>> Validated in 30556, Validated in 30557, Validated in 30558, Validated in >>>> 30559 >>> >>> I understand, but they should be integrated, right ? >>> Instead of making noise in my mailbox ;-) >>> >> maybe this could be seen as a hint to have a look at the change and write a >> short not “Yes, this is good”. >> >> Marcus > > But so many issues are integrated without a second vote of approval, so why > is it needed here ? because I just can not review everything. I just can’t. Marcus