On 09 Nov 2013, at 10:35, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote:
>
> On 08 Nov 2013, at 19:39, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 08 Nov 2013, at 19:16, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 08 Nov 2013, at 18:53, Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> yes, you have re-validate for each new image version, since things might
>>>> have changed in between ;)
>>>>
>>>> Note the tags on the left side: Validated in 30547, Validated in 30555,
>>>> Validated in 30556, Validated in 30557, Validated in 30558, Validated in
>>>> 30559
>>>
>>> I understand, but they should be integrated, right ?
>>> Instead of making noise in my mailbox ;-)
>>>
>> maybe this could be seen as a hint to have a look at the change and write a
>> short not “Yes, this is good”.
>>
>> Marcus
>
> But so many issues are integrated without a second vote of approval, so why
> is it needed here ?
because I just can not review everything. I just can’t.
Marcus
