Mariano Martinez Peck wrote > Hi Paul, and just to be sure I understand...none of them could work as a > two-way encryption, right? > The only one is your Pharo's version of Blowfish but that only works with > 8 > chars long. Is it like this? Or is there any other two-way encryption? > > Thanks! > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
Yes that's right. The PasswordHashingFFI stuff is all one way encryption. Blowfish is two way, and the current implementation only works for 8 byte chunks. I stopped working on it when the Smalltalk bcrypt implementation I wanted proved to be 5000x times slower than the FFI version. Someone needs to add the CBC part to Blowfish to encrypt longer strings. I do not know of another in image two way encryption scheme, but there may be something in the Cryptography repo. I'm not sure. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/How-to-encrypt-a-password-tp3933585p4724078.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
