On 2013-11-23, at 20:51, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote:
> On 23 Nov 2013, at 20:44, Hilaire Fernandes <hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> Le 23/11/2013 19:19, Hilaire Fernandes a écrit :
>>> Le 23/11/2013 19:05, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit :
>>>> But seriously if this is not clear, how do we improve it?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Make it work. It never worked for me, I keep trying then give up,
>>> thinking about a temporary failure, then doing other business.
>>> I don't understand what the monkey really want but it is not nice with
>>> me. So I guess I miss something that should be documented.
>>> 
>>> Hilaire
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> So registering on Pharo tracker *never* worked for me, since I try,
>> before the summer.
>> 
> 
> In the end I think is was a mistake to use fogbugz. For sure it’s nice for 
> companies, but
> for open sourse projects it just does not work with a closed bug tracker.

But I get the impression that everybody wants to submit fixes their way and 
assume
that things are resolved in another way. There is quite a system behind 
everything
which is documented and well described (of course nobody ever read it...):

https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?W65


I currently see 4 big problems:

1. the password reset mail is not sent automatically (very confusing)
2. you need 2 accounts (once for fogbugz and once for smalltalkhub)
3. there are no public inboxes on smalltalkhub (requires another bothersome 
step to add people manually)
4. submitting a slice from the image requires the previous 3 steps to be 
completed upfront

It is close to impossible to describe that accurately in text, that's why I 
opted
for a video which takes some time, but should include all the above steps. I am
pretty sure that if you follow the video step by step you will get access 
without 
problems. If not, I can update the instructions there.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to