Hi Nicolai, On 30 Dec 2013, at 13:26, Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@web.de> wrote:
> for issue 12223 > > please revert the changes done for editing history in Nautilus. > It makes more trouble than it helps. > It is a nice feature, but it is implementation has too many side effects > (discard changes on close, lose changes when jump through the > history, history has a limit) > If no one has the time to revert this, just give me a GO, and I'll do it :-) > > > Nicolai Yes, I think that features has given us a lot of trouble already, I concur with your conclusion: revert. Another thing I have been wanting to say to you: I am very impressed and very happy to see you tackle so many diverse issues with so much energy. You really embody the ‘just doIt’ tagline. Thank you very much, I for one, appreciate it a lot ! Regards, Sven BTW, from my perspective you seem to have come from nowhere, which makes your contributions even more magical. > > 2013/12/30 Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> > > On 30 Dec 2013, at 12:38, jannik.laval <jannik.la...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I am porting Phratch in Pharo 3.0 and I have some problems with the > > interface. > > I uses a one-click Pharo3.0 #30664 > > > > Here is a list of what I have: > > > > - in a debugger, it is not possible to do a Cmd-p to evaluate an > > expression. This appears only if I select with the mouse. If I make the > > selection with shift-arrow it works. > > It means that the selection with mouse or with shift-arrow are not the > > same. > > > yes, known bug. Introduced by 12144 TextModel>>getSelection. The only > solution seems to be to revert tag for now: > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12521/Undo-12144-TextModel-getSelection > > This will be in the next update. (I was offline more or less since thursday > due to helping my brother moving, so this is not integrated yet) > > > - In monticello browser: when I select my project, all the repositories > > available in Pharo are shown. As in Pharo 2.0, it should show only the > > concerned repositories (2 or 3 max). > > > Yes, this was made on purpose and there is an issue that questions if that > idea was good: > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10551/All-Monticello-Repositories-are-added-to-all-Working-Copies > (this issue is from July) > > > > - In a browser, when I did a change in the source code of a method, then I > > select another method, the changes are lost, without asking if I want to > > save changes. > > > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12223/Nautilus-loses-changes > (issue date: 22/11) > > In short: if there would be more people *actively* helping on the issue > tracker front, you would not even have seen those problems. > > > Marcus > -- Sven Van Caekenberghe Proudly supporting Pharo http://pharo.org http://association.pharo.org http://consortium.pharo.org
