Sorry, but it feels there are two discussion mixed: - if there is an unaccepted edit, it should not be lost, so we need a dialog, undo or history
- if you explicitly cancel an edit, there should not be a dialog, because you just said you want to cancel Logic. That is how I understand what Igor says, and that is also my opinion. On 12 Jan 2014, at 19:43, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote: > Igor Stasenko wrote >> I am ranting against approach of using modal popups as way to improve or >> fill gaps in UI. > > I understand and agree. And that position is not revolutionary - it's a > clear case of poor UI design. > > And, in this case, I think it's easy enough to lose code ( albeit a maximum > of 7 lines, right ;-) ) by accidentally closing a browser. Say cleaning the > world of multiple unneeded tools and repeatedly typing cmd+w, forgetting > that there is unsaved code in 1. Or (which has happened to me) trying to > close a bunch of error windows that appeared, and accidentally closing > another window because the window order is not what I expected > chronologically. > > So, only in the absence of undo for what IMHO is a likely error, especially > for new users, am I suggesting to keep the pop-ups (which I personally hate > and would rather lose code occasionally then be interrupted all the time) > available for those who want them. > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Do-you-want-to-accept-Discard-tp4735220p4736163.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
