On 12 January 2014 19:48, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry, but it feels there are two discussion mixed: > > - if there is an unaccepted edit, it should not be lost, so we need a > dialog, undo or history > > - if you explicitly cancel an edit, there should not be a dialog, because > you just said you want to cancel > > Logic. > That is how I understand what Igor says, and that is also my opinion. > > Exactly. I pressing Cmd-L, because i *want* all changes to be lost. > On 12 Jan 2014, at 19:43, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Igor Stasenko wrote > >> I am ranting against approach of using modal popups as way to improve or > >> fill gaps in UI. > > > > I understand and agree. And that position is not revolutionary - it's a > > clear case of poor UI design. > > > > And, in this case, I think it's easy enough to lose code ( albeit a > maximum > > of 7 lines, right ;-) ) by accidentally closing a browser. Say cleaning > the > > world of multiple unneeded tools and repeatedly typing cmd+w, forgetting > > that there is unsaved code in 1. Or (which has happened to me) trying to > > close a bunch of error windows that appeared, and accidentally closing > > another window because the window order is not what I expected > > chronologically. > > > > So, only in the absence of undo for what IMHO is a likely error, > especially > > for new users, am I suggesting to keep the pop-ups (which I personally > hate > > and would rather lose code occasionally then be interrupted all the time) > > available for those who want them. > > > > > > > > ----- > > Cheers, > > Sean > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Do-you-want-to-accept-Discard-tp4735220p4736163.html > > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > > > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
