great mail :) On 28 Mar 2014, at 23:03, Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@web.de> wrote:
> 2014-03-28 16:58 GMT+01:00 Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr>: > > On 28 Mar 2014, at 16:53, p...@highoctane.be wrote: > > > The look of nautilus button isn't "ok to integrate" since there is much > > more work needed to get this working properly. > > > > Now, the scrollbars in 2.0 really suck if you ask me. So, I'd vote for that > > one. > > > > Welcome back to the fray. > > > > So lets revert all the updates of this week, from the problematic ones > onwards. > > But I can only work on that next week. > > Marcus > > > > > Please No :) > > I am happy about any work that is done, even if it is "some" ui enhancement, > even if it is in feautre freeze phase. Because, we are > a just too small community. Most work is done in developers free time. We are > providing some kind of a "product" (Pharo), but > it is OUR product, we are mostly "commited to ourself". > > So, the most important point isn't a release date, but that we are > communicating, discussing, talking about that changes. > Yes, of course, I know it has to be ready at some point, it won't help if we > are working on a pre-release version for years:) > > Please let us take that changes, hoping they don't introduced new bugs and > discussing now everything where we had missed > to talk about. > > Having said that. > IF YOU have the time to work on Pharo and would like to do some enhancements > now, ok! But try to step back for one > minute and think to yourself: > are there bugs I can resolve instead? > do some code review instead? > look at the new or really old (maybe all those forgotten) issues on the > buglist. > > There are plenty of things that have to be done for the release. But of > course any other change may be worthwhile > as well (first impressions on UI related things may count ten times more then > a handfull fixed bugs). > > And if you really want your changes now, make this explicit on the mailing > list: > "hey I would include this enhancement now, because ....., would do you think?" > > > > Nicolai
