On 24 avr. 2014, at 14:37, Henrik Johansen <henrik.s.johan...@veloxit.no> wrote:
> > On 24 Apr 2014, at 2:21 , Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote: > >> >> On 24 Apr 2014, at 14:04, Christophe Demarey <christophe.dema...@inria.fr> >> wrote: >> >>> Yes it looks like there is a bug in the slot class builder. >>> I also have a job failing since #30830 >>> >> >> Yes, this is already here: >> >> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13223/Error-Should-not-happen-in-rebase-to >> >> >> Marcus >> > > > If I revert (comment out classModification propagate) > SlotClassBuilder >> #applyAndUpdateSharedVariableOrSharedPool: > classModification > ^ self track: classModification during: [ :old :new | > installer classDefinitionChangedFrom: old to: new by: > classModification. > classModification propagate ]. > > in a 80830 image, loading works fine. > > … but I guess that change might be the entire point of the patch? Yes removing this line will reintroduce the subclass bug. Moreover I think this line is not the cause but a symptom revealer (cf my other mails about classes that have wrong layout). Now I think the segfault is because of a wrong class format somewhere. > > Cheers, > Henry
