On 29 Apr 2014, at 16:13, Eliot Miranda <eliot.mira...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Marcus, > > > On Apr 29, 2014, at 6:31 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote: > >> >> On 29 Apr 2014, at 15:29, Eliot Miranda <eliot.mira...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Without any information on what has been changed these GitHub messages are >>> almost pure noise. It's more than tedious to expect someone to follow the >>> link to get more info. Can the system not include at least the commit >>> comment? >> >> There are two mails: >> >> 1) useless >> 2) it has *everything* >> -> changed methods and classes >> -> commit comments >> -> Link to get the diffs very nicely formatted. >> >> Sadly we did not find a way to turn of this one useless mail. There is sadly >> no option. > > So who develops github? Github inc. they have now >10 million repositories. got 100mill funding in 2012… > Are they willing to provide a third option? Unlikely, considering the scale of the operation. > Another potential solution would be to direct the full commit to a server > that filters/edits down the full messages and resends. > Yes, I was thinking about that… but who has the time? > Personally I'd like to keep up with the GitHub commits through email but > right now I just delete them. I could filter them out but that's no better. > :-( > >> >>> Eliot (phone) >>> >>> On Apr 29, 2014, at 4:12 AM, GitHub <nore...@github.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Branch: refs/tags/30843 >>>> Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core >> >> >
