0.00000000549181 seconds per message is just insanely low number . This is not even in the realm of nanoseconds. Is this number real ? Because I am very skeptical that one can get this kind of performance from a dynamic language even with a JIT VM.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Camille Teruel <camille.ter...@gmail.com> wrote: > > A spur image :) awesome !! > Thanks Esteban & Guille! > I'll start adapting the new class builder to Spur next wednesday when I > come back from holidays. > > On 2 juil. 2014, at 16:13, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I’ve been working on prepare Pharo to run with the new Spur VM… and > finally this week Guille and I sit together and make a huge advance :) > > here a screenshot of pharo 4 running with spur: > > <Screen Shot 2014-07-02 at 15.58.17.png> > > for more information, same image before migration, with a regular cogvm > gives this numbers: '1297023432 bytecodes/sec; 161029354 sends/sec’, so > that means that the tiny benchmarks run at 166% the speed of the old vm… > > Of course this is just one benchmark, but I’m very impressed :) > > > > Now, it is still not usable but I’m confident I can put a jenkins job to > work very soon :) > > > > Esteban > > > > ps: before you start asking: Spur WILL NOT be available for Pharo3, it > will be part of Pharo4. > > > > > > > > >
