On 29 Sep 2014, at 07:53, Damien Cassou <damien.cas...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nobody knows? This thread is frightening... > > The bugs.pharo.org related issue related to the fact that it never ever updated the issues shown is open since 1 week after it was set up, or something like that.
Marcus
> Le 20 sept. 2014 12:29, "Ben Coman" <b...@openinworld.com> a écrit :
>
> I have two tickets open on Penelope...
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?11550
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?11551
>
> I'd be happy to give them a go myself if I had access to the code and be able
> to test it.
> cheers -ben
>
>
> Marcus Denker wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 17 Sep 2014, at 13:02, Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@web.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes but,
>>>
>>> 2014-09-17 11:25 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr>:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> There are right now 675 open issues. (we managed to close 63 just the last
>>> 7 days…).
>>>
>>> A lot of those issues are very old. A lot are in a bad shape:
>>>
>>> -> not reproducible
>>> -> *completely* unclear what action could lead to solve the issue
>>> -> outdated (e.g. small improvements submitted ages ago, but even
>>> the author does not care to submit a new version for Pharo4)
>>>
>>> I think we should be more radical in closing issues. If someone submits
>>> something
>>> but can not even answer a simple question in 2 months —> this is the same
>>> as “I don’t care”.
>>>
>>> 2 months are to short. 4 or maybe 6.
>> Yes, you are right 6 months is good.
>>
>> The idea is that the issue will be closed, but with a mail to the “owner” of
>> the issue so that
>> he/she can decide to re-open… and “will work on that later” would be a valid
>> answer.
>>
>>> There are open issues without any action on our part - for months. And
>>> that does
>>> not mean "we don't care". If someone reports an issues and don't
>>> have the time to react on comments/questions for a couple of months, I
>>> understand that.
>>>
>>>
>>> nicolai
>>>
>>>
>>> So *PLEASE*:
>>>
>>> -> check all the issue that *you* submitted. Are they still relevant? Is
>>> there enough
>>> information for anyone to do anything?
>>> -> check all the issues you where involved with in discussions. It is much
>>> easier for
>>> you than for me to understand what the conclusion of the discussion is.
>>> -> help checking *old* entries. Is is still relevant? What is the next
>>> action?
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Marcus
>>>
>>
>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
