No, they are not "Pharo ready" in general. I'm working in a change proposal...



> On 3 Oct 2014, at 09:30, "p...@highoctane.be" <p...@highoctane.be> wrote:
> 
> Question about those icons, are they DarkTheme ready? I have had to invert 
> them all by hand to have something looking nice (and do all kinds of changes 
> to be able to read the contents).
> 
> Also, as GT is using Rubric, the default black/dark text has to be turned 
> into white as well as the cursor color in order to see something.
> 
> Phil
> 
>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
>> On a separate note, I played with another variation of a go icon that would 
>> be more specific to Pharo. Would you like this better?
>> 
>> <go-icon.png>
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
>>> I understand. But, even now, you associated Cmd+i as a window action. Is it 
>>> a stretch to see it as a logical action that materializes in different ways?
>>> 
>>> Doru
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> well, but that’s something that *now* you cannot do. 
>>>> what people will see now is “cmd+i does one thing in playground, and other 
>>>> thing in other parts of the system". 
>>>> For me, that’s not coherent, and introduces a level of pain. 
>>>> We are still trying to fix the annoying introduced by nautilus because 
>>>> commands are different on it than the rest of the system… I would like to 
>>>> avoid that. 
>>>> 
>>>> Esteban
>>>> 
>>>>> On 03 Oct 2014, at 08:17, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> What if you see it like this: Cmd+i inspects. If you can inspect in 
>>>>> place, you do it, otherwise, you inspect in a new window. I know it would 
>>>>> require a bit of getting used to, but imagine what will happen when the 
>>>>> class browser will allow you to inspect in place ... oops, perhaps I 
>>>>> should have not say it loud :)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Doru
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> yes, because it will be "open panel" in playground and "popup an 
>>>>>> inspector" everyplace else. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Why do you think that the "Cmd+i" option introduces incoherence?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Doru
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Esteban Lorenzano 
>>>>>>>> <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> you have to pay attention to other lists other than moose, Alex :)
>>>>>>>> nah, seriously: we have been discussing on a remap, because it is 
>>>>>>>> conflicting with other keybindings we have in pharo (cmd+o+[others]).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> For now, we have three proposals:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> cmd+e “execute”
>>>>>>>> cmd+g “go”
>>>>>>>> cmd+i, and remap gtinspector to cmd+I
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> personally I prefer the second one.
>>>>>>>> the third one looks like a good idea, but it will introduce an 
>>>>>>>> incoherence in the system (unless we remap everything, everywhere), so 
>>>>>>>> I prefer to stick with “cmd+g”
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Esteban
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> > On 02 Oct 2014, at 23:28, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.ber...@me.com> 
>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > It does in the moose image. Pity, this is so useful...
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>> > Alexandre
>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>> > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>>>>>>>> > Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>>>>>>>> > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "Every thing has its own flow"
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> "Every thing has its own flow"
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>> 
>>> "Every thing has its own flow"
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>> 
>> "Every thing has its own flow"
> 

Reply via email to