I believe in Redline. I think it's a very important project, strategically. On Twitter and elsewhere, I am urging contributors to join Redline. It would be something of a tragedy if Redline failed to reach version 1.0. *We need Smalltalk on the JVM.*
jamesl wrote > Hi Smalltalkers, > > Redline Smalltalk is not dead although it looks like it. > I recently made the grammar much cleaner and moved to using Antlr4 as well > as cleaning up the > internals. Yes - what is in the core project in github is dormant and I > have spun off 'stc' to contain > the the work Im doing until an appropriate time to merge back into that > main. > > I'd love some help but right now you would be limited to copying across > the runtime library and writing > tests around it as I concentrate on the bytecode generation and underlying > code - which is hard to have too many people helping with. > > I'm *very* busy in my life right now with a startup (http://mywave.me) and > personal life but I really > am trying to find the time to push this along. > > I've set myself some fitness, work and Smalltalk goals for this year and > all going well Redline will be > out in September. BUT - Please don't hate me. > > This is the Year of Smalltalk and we can change the world - one JVM at a > time ;) > > - James. > Redline Smalltalk -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/InfoWorld-on-Redline-Smalltalk-tp4799612p4799830.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
