On Mar 4, 2015, at 11:02 AM, "Marcus Denker-4 [via Smalltalk]" <[email protected]> wrote: > We either do that change or we don’t. There is no way to keep it backward > compatible.
Thanks for the info. Sorry about my frustration :/ But I just had a huge Aha that may help understanding changes in the future. I went to the GitHub mirror and discovered something /really/ cool... 1. I navigated to the class side of RBVariableNode and noticed the button with the clock & backward arrow on it 2. Clicking it, lead me to a list of commits perfectly scoped to the methods in question. There, I clicked on the SHA of the last commit 3. I was presented with a) the image version where it was integrated b) the issues integrated, and c) the method diffs!!! I didn't realize that e.g. the update and issue numbers were on github. This is really great. Screenshot 2015-03-04 11.50.34.png (182K) <http://forum.world.st/attachment/4809534/0/Screenshot%202015-03-04%2011.50.34.png> Screenshot 2015-03-04 11.48.09.png (94K) <http://forum.world.st/attachment/4809534/1/Screenshot%202015-03-04%2011.48.09.png> Screenshot 2015-03-04 11.48.37.png (325K) <http://forum.world.st/attachment/4809534/2/Screenshot%202015-03-04%2011.48.37.png> ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/PetitParser-Tests-Failing-in-Pharo-4-0-tp4809513p4809534.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
