> On 04 Mar 2015, at 17:48, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Mar 4, 2015, at 11:02 AM, "Marcus Denker-4 [via Smalltalk]" <[hidden 
> email]> wrote:
>> We either do that change or we don’t. There is no way to keep it backward 
>> compatible. 
> 
> Thanks for the info. Sorry about my frustration :/ But I just had a huge Aha 
> that may help understanding changes in the future. I went to the GitHub 
> mirror and discovered something /really/ cool...

Yes, we are very cool ;-)

Seriously though: good explanation.

This is again an example of multiple smaller things coming together and 
amplifying each other. 

> 1. I navigated to the class side of RBVariableNode and noticed the button 
> with the clock & backward arrow on it
> 
> 2. Clicking it, lead me to a list of commits perfectly scoped to the methods 
> in question. There, I clicked on the SHA of the last commit
> 
> 3. I was presented with a) the image version where it was integrated b) the 
> issues integrated, and c) the method diffs!!!
> 
> I didn't realize that e.g. the update and issue numbers were on github. This 
> is really great.
> Cheers, 
> Sean
> 
> View this message in context: Re: PetitParser Tests Failing in Pharo 4.0
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Reply via email to