Hi Nicolas, > On 24 Mar 2015, at 16:32, Nicolas Cellier > <nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think you're looking after the number of common chars only at beginning. > Wouldn't the method finder hit a better match? > Yes. your right. I found the method I was actually needing that gives me the behavior I expected.
String>>charactersExactlyMatching: > The method works as advertised in the comment. Though I find it very > questionnable: > Doesn't "match" imply some other semantic like pattern matching (and thus > things like wild character etc...)? > Is such specific behavior usefull? Really? Why/Where? > What is misleading is that the howManyMatch: is in String. I believe it should be moved up to SequencableCollection Noury
