2015-04-02 16:06 GMT+02:00 Max Leske <maxle...@gmail.com>:

>
> On 02 Apr 2015, at 00:29, Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@web.de> wrote:
>
> 2015-04-01 18:56 GMT+02:00 Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com>:
>
>> Issue 14606 [1] is tagged "Really Important" where evaluating....
>>
>>     | t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 |
>>     t1 := 1.
>>     t2 := 2.
>>     t3 := 3.
>>     t4 := 4.
>>     t5 := 5 .
>>     t6 := 6.
>>     [    t5 := 50.
>>          t6 := 60.
>>          t3 + t4.
>>          1 halt.
>>     ] value
>>
>> => can't see the value of t4, t5, t6.
>>
>> I've just submitted a possible solution for this, but its a bit late
>> before release for such a change - so I'm asking for "all hands in" to help
>> stress test it.  You don't need to review code, just please merge latest
>> slice 14606 into your normal working image and report your experience.
>>
>> cheers -ben
>>
>> [1] https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?14606#124466
>>
>>
>
> Here is a minimal example that does not work with your fix. (condensed
> from the failing test case)
>
> [ :x :y |
>     (thisContext tempNamed: 'x') inspect.
>     (1 to: 1)
>         do: [ :i |
>             | k l |
>             k := y.
>             l := x.
>             (thisContext tempNamed: 'x') inspect ] ] value: 1 value: 23
>
> Both inspector windows should show the same value for the argument 'x'.
> But the result is
> 1. inspector -> 1
> 2. inspector -> 23
>
>
>
> Before loading the slice, both inspectors show ‘1’. That can’t be right
> either…
>

No, that is correct. Both inspector inspect the block argument 'x', it is
assigned with value 1
with the message value:1 value:23
and the block argument value can not change, therefore both inspect should
show '1'


>
> Max
>

Reply via email to