> On 21 Apr 2015, at 14:37, Stephan Eggermont <step...@stack.nl> wrote: > > On 21/04/15 13:14, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > >> nope, solution is to explicit version to load :) > > Explicit symbolic version, that is. > Never a fixed number, as that can't be patched. > That breaks the update process just as well.
no… explicit fixed number. I need version 1.0.42, not #stable or #myCoolFantasyNumberWichAfterAllIsEqualButWorstTo-1-0-42 And of course can be patched…. with version 1.0.43. That’s the only way to be able to make the update process work. Esteban > > Stephan > >
