2015-04-21 15:21 GMT+02:00 stepharo <steph...@free.fr>: > @esteban Pavel is not stupid. So we could ask him what are his scenarios. > > @Pavel So pavel can you explain what and why you need? > > And yes we will have to have another level of tooling because > now it can be really difficult
I simply wanted to make a local Pharo FileTree repository to have a free hands for testing of system configurations. Something like a personal Pharo fork. The fact that this packages are all missing because they are already handled by configurations is welcomed information. However I think that repositories of this project should be in the list of default repositories. Maybe we should add copy of the configurations to the Pharo50 repository too. Cheers, -- Pavel > > @esteban > we should add the repositories to the projects because we should be able to > publish > in this repositories. Else it will be again the time of the guy fixing a > problem that will be consumed. > > Or we can also simply say to people that we do not care of their time, but I > would prefer that we pay attention. > In that case this is simple for me I will not fix or even look at code that > is not in the > main system and with this approach we will all have lost something. > > > Stef >
