They already are integrated! it's a matter of rewrite all usages of MultiByteScaryStream and friends...
El jue., 30 de abr. de 2015 a la(s) 4:06 p. m., stepharo <steph...@free.fr> escribió: > > I am biased, but the Zn converters are better. Why ? Because they work > between String <-> Bytes as a text encoder/decoder should. They also have a > number of extra features (counting the number of encoded bytes, being able > to move backwards on input, being able to be very strict), are faster and > have a clearer implementation. Furthermore, they are more correct and > implement more encodings. > > > > There is also good documentation > http://stfx.eu/EnterprisePharo/Zinc-Encoding-Meta/ > > > > ZnCharacter[Read|Write]Stream are also very instructive, compare them to > MultiByteStream. > > > > Should we throw the other one out ? Probably. But it is the same > problems as with Xtreams: the API is different and adding a compatibility > layer would defeat the purpose. So I don't know. > > > > Sven > > I would integrate the good ones and deprecate the old ones! > > Stef > > >
