so ugly!
Le 8/6/15 17:27, Guillermo Polito a écrit :
If not we could maybe write a yaml parser :)
http://yaml.org/
It has no brackets, it is also hierarchical and it supports comments.
El lun., 8 de jun. de 2015 a la(s) 5:16 p. m., Sven Van Caekenberghe
<s...@stfx.eu <mailto:s...@stfx.eu>> escribió:
> On 08 Jun 2015, at 17:03, Damien Cassou <damien.cas...@inria.fr
<mailto:damien.cas...@inria.fr>> wrote:
>
>
> Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu <mailto:s...@stfx.eu>> writes:
>
>> I am not so sure we should add that.
>>
>> The JSON spec explicitly does not allow comments because of
fear of abuse (that the comments would be used to add semantic
meaning outside the spec).
>
>
> really? That's surprising. Comments in configuration files are very
> important. Even more when the configuration files are templates
for new
> users.
I know some people are using STON in ways that I did not
originally anticipate, that is of course cool, but writing
configuration files was not the original goal. STON is a version
of JSON that is closer to our object model.
Like I said, I will think about it.
> --
> Damien Cassou
> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
>
> "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
> losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill
>
