> On 10 Jun 2015, at 15:13, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote: > > This is in the entreprise book. I added a subsection on comments. > May be I committed but forgot to push. > Now I did it.
And now I see it. I made a small change. > Stef > > > Le 9/6/15 21:50, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit : >> Where exactly can I find what you changed ? >> I don't see any commit of you on github ... >> >>> On 09 Jun 2015, at 20:10, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 9/6/15 20:06, stepharo a écrit : >>>> I will update the STON chapter :) >>> Done :) >>> >>>> >>>> Le 8/6/15 23:39, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit : >>>>> I would do it like this: use a wrapping stream to skip comments. >>>>> >>>>> === >>>>> Name: STON-Core-SvenVanCaekenberghe.59 >>>>> Author: SvenVanCaekenberghe >>>>> Time: 8 June 2015, 11:34:32.886167 pm >>>>> UUID: 7ab942b5-9d1a-44c3-9d58-da29feb72380 >>>>> Ancestors: STON-Core-SvenVanCaekenberghe.58 >>>>> >>>>> Add experimental STONCStyleCommentsSkipStream and tests >>>>> === >>>>> Name: STON-Tests-SvenVanCaekenberghe.54 >>>>> Author: SvenVanCaekenberghe >>>>> Time: 8 June 2015, 11:34:52.918771 pm >>>>> UUID: 3dcb2c9c-6efe-4d62-bf36-3bbe91f09d08 >>>>> Ancestors: STON-Tests-SvenVanCaekenberghe.53 >>>>> >>>>> Add experimental STONCStyleCommentsSkipStream and tests >>>>> === >>>>> >>>>> Then you can do as follows: >>>>> >>>>> STON fromStream: (STONCStyleCommentsSkipStream on: 'Point[/* this is X*/ >>>>> 1, /* this is Y*/ 2] // Nice huh ?' readStream). >>>>> >>>>> => 1@2 >>>>> >>>>> STON fromStream: (STONCStyleCommentsSkipStream on: '// Here is how you >>>>> create a point: >>>>> Point[ >>>>> // this is X >>>>> 1, >>>>> // this is Y >>>>> 2 ] >>>>> // Nice huh ?' readStream). >>>>> >>>>> => 1@2 >>>>> >>>>> This helper class would be useable in other contexts too (like NeoJSON). >>>>> >>>>> The advantage is that it does not change the STON (or JSON) syntax >>>>> itself, it just add some functionality for those who want it. >>>>> >>>>> What do you think ? >>>>> >>>>> Sven >>>>> >>>>> PS: this probably needs some more testing >>>>> >>>>>> On 08 Jun 2015, at 17:16, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 08 Jun 2015, at 17:03, Damien Cassou <damien.cas...@inria.fr> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> writes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am not so sure we should add that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The JSON spec explicitly does not allow comments because of fear of >>>>>>>> abuse (that the comments would be used to add semantic meaning outside >>>>>>>> the spec). >>>>>>> really? That's surprising. Comments in configuration files are very >>>>>>> important. Even more when the configuration files are templates for new >>>>>>> users. >>>>>> I know some people are using STON in ways that I did not originally >>>>>> anticipate, that is of course cool, but writing configuration files was >>>>>> not the original goal. STON is a version of JSON that is closer to our >>>>>> object model. >>>>>> >>>>>> Like I said, I will think about it. >>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Damien Cassou >>>>>>> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without >>>>>>> losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > >
