Hi Sven!
I'm finally using the new STON with comments and I found one little
problem: my ston file has urls :/
{
// comment ok, skipped
/* comment ok, skipped */
"aURL": "http://ouch.it.will.be.skipped/and/break?my=ston";
}
That is, doing:
STON fromStreamWithComments: '{
// comment ok, skipped
/* comment ok, skipped */
"aURL": "http://ouch.it.will.be.skipped/and/break?my=ston";
}' readStream
Will fail with an invalid input error because after skipping comments my
STON stream remains like
STON fromStreamWithComments: '{
"aURL": "http:
}
Any thoughts?
Guille
El dom., 14 de jun. de 2015 a la(s) 3:06 a. m., stepharo <steph...@free.fr>
escribió:
>
>
> Le 10/6/15 20:39, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
> >> On 10 Jun 2015, at 15:13, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote:
> >>
> >> This is in the entreprise book. I added a subsection on comments.
> >> May be I committed but forgot to push.
> >> Now I did it.
> > And now I see it.
> > I made a small change.
> super!
>
> >
> >> Stef
> >>
> >>
> >> Le 9/6/15 21:50, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
> >>> Where exactly can I find what you changed ?
> >>> I don't see any commit of you on github ...
> >>>
> >>>> On 09 Jun 2015, at 20:10, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Le 9/6/15 20:06, stepharo a écrit :
> >>>>> I will update the STON chapter :)
> >>>> Done :)
> >>>>
> >>>>> Le 8/6/15 23:39, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
> >>>>>> I would do it like this: use a wrapping stream to skip comments.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ===
> >>>>>> Name: STON-Core-SvenVanCaekenberghe.59
> >>>>>> Author: SvenVanCaekenberghe
> >>>>>> Time: 8 June 2015, 11:34:32.886167 pm
> >>>>>> UUID: 7ab942b5-9d1a-44c3-9d58-da29feb72380
> >>>>>> Ancestors: STON-Core-SvenVanCaekenberghe.58
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Add experimental STONCStyleCommentsSkipStream and tests
> >>>>>> ===
> >>>>>> Name: STON-Tests-SvenVanCaekenberghe.54
> >>>>>> Author: SvenVanCaekenberghe
> >>>>>> Time: 8 June 2015, 11:34:52.918771 pm
> >>>>>> UUID: 3dcb2c9c-6efe-4d62-bf36-3bbe91f09d08
> >>>>>> Ancestors: STON-Tests-SvenVanCaekenberghe.53
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Add experimental STONCStyleCommentsSkipStream and tests
> >>>>>> ===
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Then you can do as follows:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> STON fromStream: (STONCStyleCommentsSkipStream on: 'Point[/* this
> is X*/ 1, /* this is Y*/ 2] // Nice huh ?' readStream).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> => 1@2
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> STON fromStream: (STONCStyleCommentsSkipStream on: '// Here is how
> you create a point:
> >>>>>> Point[
> >>>>>> // this is X
> >>>>>> 1,
> >>>>>> // this is Y
> >>>>>> 2 ]
> >>>>>> // Nice huh ?' readStream).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> => 1@2
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This helper class would be useable in other contexts too (like
> NeoJSON).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The advantage is that it does not change the STON (or JSON) syntax
> itself, it just add some functionality for those who want it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What do you think ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sven
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> PS: this probably needs some more testing
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 08 Jun 2015, at 17:16, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 08 Jun 2015, at 17:03, Damien Cassou <damien.cas...@inria.fr>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> writes:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I am not so sure we should add that.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The JSON spec explicitly does not allow comments because of fear
> of abuse (that the comments would be used to add semantic meaning outside
> the spec).
> >>>>>>>> really? That's surprising. Comments in configuration files are
> very
> >>>>>>>> important. Even more when the configuration files are templates
> for new
> >>>>>>>> users.
> >>>>>>> I know some people are using STON in ways that I did not
> originally anticipate, that is of course cool, but writing configuration
> files was not the original goal. STON is a version of JSON that is closer
> to our object model.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Like I said, I will think about it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Damien Cassou
> >>>>>>>> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
> >>>>>>>> losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
