Ok I will do that, thanks again
Fanck
> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 15:12:06 +0200
> From: thierry.goub...@gmail.com
> To: pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] RPackage classes name
>
> Le 19/07/2015 13:58, Franck Warlouzet a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thanks for the explanation ! So Nicolai is probably right,
> > RPackageCreated should be named RPackageRegistered to be consistent.
>
> Yes, Nicolai is right. RPackageCreated is announced in two places:
> RPackageOrganizer>>registerPackage:
> and
> RPackageOrganizer>>ensureExistAndRegisterPackageNamed:
>
> (i.e. both are "registerPackage" methods).
>
> A simple class rename refactoring should be enough ;)
>
> Thierry
>
> >
> > Franck
> >
> > > Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 13:47:37 +0200
> > > From: thierry.goub...@gmail.com
> > > To: pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] RPackage classes name
> > >
> > > Hi Franck,
> > >
> > > Le 18/07/2015 15:48, Franck Warlouzet a écrit :
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Currently I am working on groups in Nautilus, and I am actually
> > > > reimplementing them because I could not just fix them (There are a lot
> > > > of bugs which make them almost unusable in practice), it is too
> > > > complicated for nothing. Doing this I somehow have to use RPackage
> > > > announcements and I am a little bit confused by their name.
> > > > When you remove a package, an announcement RPackageUnregistered is
> > > > raised, but I do not know if there is a difference with RPackageRemoved
> > > > (which by the way does not exist, but I was expecting a name like
> > that).
> > > > What is this registration thing ? There is no RPackageRegistered but
> > > > there is RPackageCreated.
> > > >
> > > > So I am confused. Does someone know if I should create an announcement
> > > > RPackageRemoved or rename RPackageCreated into RPackageRegistered ? It
> > > > does not seem consistent and so it is confusing. Or can someone explain
> > > > to me the notion of registration for the RPackages ?
> > >
> > > I'd say that, at the moment, the RPackage code is a bit half-way through
> > > a complete handling of all those aspects; some decisions about packages
> > > are left outside the RPackage code, in Monticello in particular.
> > >
> > > So objects tracking packages changes should also have a look into the
> > > Monticello related announcements which are (digging through the
> > > AltBrowser code)... MCWorkingCopyCreated, MCWorkingCopyModified,
> > > MCWorkingCopyDeleted, in addition to RPackageCreated,
> > > RPackageUnregistered. For example, AltBrowser, for its package
> > > categories and browsing environments (aka groups), tracks all of them.
> > >
> > > I haven't checked, but I suspect that only Monticello can really delete
> > > a package (by unloading it) and that RPackageOrganizer will react to it
> > > by unregistering the package. Another possibility is the removal of a
> > > system category.
> > >
> > > So renaming RPackageUnregistered as RPackageRemoved requires significant
> > > changes in RPackageOrganizer, for which I'd say beware: this is a very
> > > good way of confirming that Pharo5 is alpha software ;)
> > >
> > > Thierry
> > >
>
>
