Benjamin forced us to react and the Inria lawyers did their job. Then he
wrote this funny sentence.
I asked the inria laywers to stay calm when they saw this sentence. You
know they laugh one minute
and after they want to attack. So I would ignore anything related to
Benjamin because the spirit is not
positive.
I would focus on the current spec issues in Pharo and see step by step
how we can address them.
If we propose the same solution that in the Spec git repo then it will
be a coincidence.
Stef
Le 2/11/15 07:57, Nicolai Hess a écrit :
2015-11-02 16:49 GMT+01:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@gmail.com
<mailto:nicolaih...@gmail.com>>:
2015-11-02 16:30 GMT+01:00 webwarrior <r...@webwarrior.ws
<mailto:r...@webwarrior.ws>>:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/16725
Almost a month has passed
- there are many other things to do
- we don't have a real spec maintainer
- the issue has milestone "Later"
- ~ 300 for milestone pharo 5
if you can create slices for the changes, I can help with testing
and reviewing them.
Now, after rereading the note about the licence
"https://github.com/spec-framework/spec":
"After I realised that the Pharo board was not able to consider the
concept of /copyright infringement/, and that stealing a project was
far from an issue to them, I decided to give up and to give away the
code since I do not want to fight with people not even understanding
the pupose of the battle"
I am not sure, I don't know about this "battle", but don't want to
have anything to do with this battle.
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Case-16725-why-no-reaction-tp4858968.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive
at Nabble.com.
