Allow me to speak a little on my ideas of a distributed meta layer and
control layer in cloud deployments with Squeak/Pharo, hopefully in bounds.
A distributed system must have an metadata repsoitory describing the
traffic and activity. If you look at deployment, code that works with a
type and version of data must be present. With packaging and dynamic
loading, chunks of code registered to a data type/version in the meta
demand loads a achunk to do directed work in a particular deployed
image. BigData event flows and data analysis like to get replicated and
relocated, in realtime. Supporting this in the meta definitional layer
and the 1/2 control layer starts to do dynamic, late-binding in the
network. This is the advantage Squeak/Pharo image-based environments
bring to the business table.
Thank you and apologies,
robert
On 12/16/2015 09:57 AM, H. Hirzel wrote:
Is there a Pharo implementation? https://avro.apache.org/docs/1.2.0/
On 12/16/15, Robert Withers <robert.w.with...@gmail.com> wrote:
Please consider Avro.
robert
On 12/16/2015 08:58 AM, H. Hirzel wrote:
If you want to move data to Java then you probably go for JSON or a
particuar XML format.
On 12/16/15, H. Hirzel <hannes.hir...@gmail.com> wrote:
No, it is a Smalltalk format.
On 12/16/15, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com> wrote:
2015-12-16 14:41 GMT+01:00 H. Hirzel <hannes.hir...@gmail.com>:
It probably should be noted here as well that
http://pharo.gemtalksystems.com/book/PharoTools/SIXX/
Just to know does java implementation exists?
--
. .. .. ^,^ best, robert
--
. .. .. ^,^ best, robert
