I'd like to add that this is a real challenge to existing players in
BigData, all of who offer solutions in this exact space. Whoever
controls it's specification, controls it's cloud market.
My back of the envelope proposal (my apologies for my abrasiveness with
this approach) is such:
We develop a dynamic cloud meta & control solution: replicated,
eventually consistent and so on. We define the serialization, interfaces
and package identification to this meta as open-source standards.
With interfaces I think Avro.
With serialization I think ASN1DER encoding, plus non-fixed dynamic
structure extension.
With package identification I think Gradle. Do we have a groovy compiler?
I thought I would round out my thinking as I believe this to be an
important opportunity. Given that the new internet is going to be
governed by always running, maximally interactive execution sites, it
will naturally move to Smalltalk, so I do not think there is anything
for anyone to be concerned about.
Patience and not reacting emotionally to misinformation in the
marketplace will show true colors. Business is warfare. We have the
advantage.
peace,
robert
On 12/16/2015 12:38 PM, Robert Withers wrote:
Allow me to speak a little on my ideas of a distributed meta layer and
control layer in cloud deployments with Squeak/Pharo, hopefully in
bounds.
A distributed system must have an metadata repsoitory describing the
traffic and activity. If you look at deployment, code that works with
a type and version of data must be present. With packaging and dynamic
loading, chunks of code registered to a data type/version in the meta
demand loads a achunk to do directed work in a particular deployed
image. BigData event flows and data analysis like to get replicated
and relocated, in realtime. Supporting this in the meta definitional
layer and the 1/2 control layer starts to do dynamic, late-binding in
the network. This is the advantage Squeak/Pharo image-based
environments bring to the business table.
Thank you and apologies,
robert
On 12/16/2015 09:57 AM, H. Hirzel wrote:
Is there a Pharo implementation? https://avro.apache.org/docs/1.2.0/
On 12/16/15, Robert Withers <robert.w.with...@gmail.com> wrote:
Please consider Avro.
robert
On 12/16/2015 08:58 AM, H. Hirzel wrote:
If you want to move data to Java then you probably go for JSON or a
particuar XML format.
On 12/16/15, H. Hirzel <hannes.hir...@gmail.com> wrote:
No, it is a Smalltalk format.
On 12/16/15, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com> wrote:
2015-12-16 14:41 GMT+01:00 H. Hirzel <hannes.hir...@gmail.com>:
It probably should be noted here as well that
http://pharo.gemtalksystems.com/book/PharoTools/SIXX/
Just to know does java implementation exists?
--
. .. .. ^,^ best, robert
--
. .. .. ^,^ best, robert
