So we're not mocking "a network", but a webserver instead. Am I right?
Or are we mocking faults in the bottom level? (like connection aborted, and stuff like that). Regards! Esteban A. Maringolo 2016-03-02 21:16 GMT-03:00 Frank Shearar <frank.shea...@gmail.com>: > Er. How do you reliably inject arbitrary network faults in your > localhost network again? > > frank > > On 2 March 2016 at 08:27, Chris Muller <asquea...@gmail.com> wrote: >> A mock network will never test as thoroughly as locahost network.. >> >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymc...@me.com> wrote: >>> HI, there is one thing in Ruby (on Rails) that I really like and it is a >>> option to mock network. This means that when you run a test your network >>> requests are handled by a mock object and you can tell it that for this URI >>> it should give you this response. This is helpful if you don’t want to rely >>> on a network availability or test certain corner cases. >>> >>> Is there anything like this in Pharo? >>> >>> Uko >> >
